In many cases, executives believe that if there is a control system in place, it will do the job for which it was intended. However in many organizations their systems and policies are constructed for day-to-day transactions but not for analyzing the abundance of raw data to make sense of what it all means. Sustainability is based on transforming data into analyzable information for insights and decision-making. This is where business intelligence and enterprise performance management systems with embedded business analytics fit in, such as from software vendors like SAS.
Perhaps this is because when an organization is enjoying success, it breeds adversity to taking wise and calculated risks. Each new day going forward requires making strategic adjustments to anticipate continuously changing customer needs and countertactics by competitors. Risk management is about balancing risk appetite with risk exposure. If there is not enough risk-taking appetite, then performance will eventually suffer. (And if risk appetite is excessive .. well, the current global fiscal crisis is evidence of the outcome.) How can an organization create sustainability for its long-term performance?
Often no one challenges the status quo and asks the tough questions. Delusion and fear of the unknown can develop in organizations that affect how they interact with key relationships like those with customers and suppliers. My belief is that when it comes to considering whether to implement and integrate the various component methodologies that constitute Performance Management, there are actually two choices. To do it or not to do it. Many organizations neglect the fact that the choice to not act oakley sunglasses outlet, which means to continue with the status quo and to perpetuate making decisions the way they currently are, is also a decision.
With today’s global recession http://goodcoachoutlet.weebly.com, the stakes have never been higher for managers to make better decisions with analyzable information. Companies that successfully leverage their information out-think, out-smart http://goodcoachoutlet.weebly.com, and out-execute their competitors. High-performing enterprises are building their strategies around information-driven insights that generate results from the power of analytics of all flavors, such as segmentation and regression analysis, and especially predictive analytics. They are proactive, not reactive.
Invulnerable today, aimless tomorrow
How can you explain why seemingly successful companies, like Wang Labs and Digital Equipment, go bankrupt or fall from a successful leadership position? I continue to be intrigued by the fact that almost half of the roughly 25 companies that passed the rigorous tests to be listed in the once famous book by Tom Peters and Robert Waterman, In Search of Excellence oakley sunglasses outlet, today either no longer exist, are in bankruptcy, or have performed poorly. What happened in the 25 years since the book was published?
Ponder this question: “How many of the original Standard and Poor’s (S&P) 500 list originally created in 1957 are on that list today?” Per research from Professor Gary Biddle of the University of Hong Kong, the answer is 74, just 15 percent. And of those 74, only 12 have outperformed the S&P index average. Pretty grim.
The Emerging Need for Analytics
To sustain long-term success companies need leaders with vision and inspiration to answer “Where do we want to go?” Then, by communicating their strategy to managers and employees, they can empower their workforce with analytical tools for the workforce to correctly answer oakley sunglasses outlet, “How will we get there?” ###
Executives are human and can make mistakes, but in company failures, these are not simply minor misjudgments. In many cases, their errors are enormous miscalculations that can be explained by problems in leadership. Regardless of how decentralized some businesses might claim to be in their decision-making, corporations can be rapidly brought to the brink of failure by executives whose personal qualities create risks rather than mitigate them.
In Finkelstein’s book, he observes that these flaws can be honorable such as with CEOs like An Wang of Wang Labs or with rogue CEOs like Dennis Kozlowski of Tyco, Ken Lay of Enron, John Rigas of Adelphia, and Steve Hilbert of Conseco.
In Sydney Finkelstein’s book Why Smart Executives Fail, based on his research, he observed that the causes of failure are not because executives are unintelligent – they are typically quite smart. The causes of failure are not necessarily due to unforeseeable events. Companies that have failed often knew what was happening but chose not to do much about it. The causes of failure are not always errors due to taking the wrong daily actions.
The explanation involves the attitude of executives. This includes a breakdown in their reasoning, their strategic thinking, and their creation of a culture for metrics and deep analysis.
Prominent examples are Wang Labs and Digital Equipment. Wang Labs failed in part because it specialized in computers designed exclusively for word processing and did not foresee general-purpose personal computers with word processing software in the 1980s, mainly developed by IBM.
Digital Equipment was satisfied with its dominance in the core minicomputer market, in which it was first to introduce the minicomputer. However, Digital was slow to adapt its product line to the new markets for personal computers (PCs). The company’s entry into the personal computer arena in 1982 was a failure, and later PC collaborations with Olivetti and Intel achieved mixed results
没有评论:
发表评论